Worksheet generator

1.E — 86400KA-0124Estimate to the nearest choice

• AI gave the number of minutes in a day instead of the number of seconds.
• BI gave the number of seconds in one hour rather than in a whole day.
• CI multiplied the 24 hours by a round thousand instead of converting properly.
• DI multiplied 60 by a round thousand, using one conversion and inventing the other.

2.B — 12KA-0121Try small cases first

• AI used the number of hands each person shakes rather than the number of people.
• CI doubled the answer, forgetting that the halving has already been done.
• DI halved 66 and treated that as the number of people.
• EI gave the number of handshakes back as the number of people.

3.A — 12KA-0122Back-solve from the answer choices

• BI assumed a number with two different prime factors always has six factors.
• CI counted the factors of 16 as six by including a number twice.
• DI assumed a square number has six factors without listing them.
• EI counted the powers of 3 up to 27 and thought there were six of them.

4.C — 28KA-0123Eliminate impossible choices by bounding

• AI ruled out the square 6 by 6, forgetting that a square is a rectangle.
• BI did not think to try 4 by 9, so I judged this perimeter impossible.
• DI missed the 3 by 12 rectangle when listing the factor pairs.
• EI stopped listing factor pairs before reaching 2 by 18.

5.D — 1200KA-0128Check units and re-read before bubbling

• AI worked entirely in metres and gave the answer in square metres.
• BI multiplied 30 by 0.4 without converting the metres to centimetres at all.
• CI converted 0.4 m to 4 cm rather than 40 cm.
• EI converted 0.4 m to 400 cm, moving the decimal point one place too far.

6.E — 408KA-0129Sanity-check with a second method

• AI worked out 17 times 20 and forgot to add the 17 times 4 part.
• BI worked out 17 times 4 as 28 instead of 68 when adding the parts together.
• CI worked out 17 times 4 as 48 instead of 68 when adding the parts together.
• DI made a carrying slip of ten in the final addition of the two parts.

7.B — 6KA-0045Back-solve from the answer choices

• AI tested the smallest choice first and stopped at the first one that felt about right.
• CI read a third of itself as three times itself and solved the wrong equation.
• DI reversed the comparison, finding a number whose third is 4 less than itself in the wrong direction.
• EI picked the largest choice because dividing by three made me expect a big starting number.

8.A — 1/10KA-0125Spot the trick vs. decide to grind

• BI cancelled the chain but stopped one factor early, leaving a 9 on the bottom.
• CI worked out the first bracket and assumed the rest made no difference.
• DI gave the last bracket on its own instead of the whole product.
• EI assumed everything cancels completely, leaving nothing behind.

9.B — Answer it with your best guess, mark it, and move onKA-0126Time triage: now, later, or guess

• AI let the time already spent decide, but that time is gone whatever I do next.
• CI moved on but left a blank, which scores nothing if I never get back to it.
• DI spent time re-reading work I had no reason to doubt, while 21 unseen questions waited.
• EI assumed the hardest questions are the best use of time, when the unseen easy ones are worth the same each.

10.B — Read all ten quickly, pick the two or three that look most doable, and fill in every answer before the endKA-0130Managing the 5-point block

• AI worked in order, so a hard early question could eat the time meant for easier later ones.
• CI assumed the hardest question is worth the most, but every question in this block scores the same.
• DI used length as a proxy for difficulty, which is not reliable in this block.
• EI spread the time equally, which is too little for the questions I could do and wasted on the ones I could not.