Worksheet generator

1.B — 28KA-0035Handshakes and pairs

• AI doubled the number of people, as if each person made two handshakes in total.
• CI let each person shake hands with all eight people including themselves before halving.
• DI multiplied 8 by 7 and forgot that each handshake was counted from both sides.
• EI multiplied 8 by 8, counting every ordered pair including a person with themselves.

2.E — 8KA-0143Systematic listing

• AI counted the two available digits rather than the numbers they can build.
• BI counted the three positions instead of the numbers.
• CI used only two of the three positions when multiplying.
• DI multiplied 2 by 3, mixing the number of digits with the number of positions.

3.B — 15KA-0074Selections of a few objects

• AI doubled the group size instead of counting pairs.
• CI allowed a student to be paired with themselves, adding six impossible pairs.
• DI counted each pair twice, once in each order, and forgot to halve.
• EI multiplied 6 by 6, counting every ordered pair including a student with themselves.

4.C — 6KA-0025Counting up to symmetry

• AI also treated bracelets that are mirror images as the same, but only rotations were allowed.
• BI divided the number of beads by itself rather than dividing the number of arrangements by the number of rotations.
• DI divided the 24 arrangements by 2 instead of by the 4 rotations of a circle of four beads.
• EI counted every arrangement in a line and forgot that rotating a bracelet gives the same bracelet.

5.C — 4KA-0040The pigeonhole principle

• AI answered with the lucky case, where the first two socks happen to match.
• BI used the number of colours as my answer without adding one for the sock that must repeat.
• DI worked from the number of socks of each colour instead of the number of colours.
• EI took the whole drawer, guaranteeing a pair but far more socks than are needed.

6.D — 30KA-0047Counting by position (sliding window)

• AI counted only the sixteen smallest squares and stopped there.
• BI counted the small squares and the single big one, and forgot every size in between.
• CI counted the 2 by 2 squares as four rather than nine, splitting the board into blocks.
• EI used 4 by 4 positions for every size instead of shrinking the range as the square grows.

7.C — 48KA-0070Counting with restrictions

• AI treated the twins as one child and forgot they can also swap places with each other.
• BI glued the twins together into a single block but then forgot that the block can be arranged with the others in more ways than I counted.
• DI halved the 120 total, assuming the twins are together in exactly half the arrangements.
• EI counted every arrangement of five children and forgot the twins' condition entirely.

8.B — 252KA-0075Complementary counting

• AI counted the numbers made entirely of digits other than 7 in every position, including a leading zero.
• CI counted the numbers with a 7 in each position separately and forgot that some were counted twice.
• DI added three lots of 90 and one extra hundred, double counting the 700s.
• EI counted the numbers with no 7 at all and gave that instead of subtracting it.

9.C — 7KA-0077The pigeonhole principle

• AI answered with the luckiest case, where the first three balls happen to match.
• BI found the worst case of two of each colour and forgot to take one more.
• DI multiplied the three colours by the three balls I need, rather than thinking about the worst case.
• EI worked from the number of balls of each colour rather than from the number of colours.

10.C — 55KA-0078Extremal / worst-case counting

• AI found the smallest possible total of the other nine and gave that instead of what is left.
• BI assumed the biggest number could be at most half the total.
• DI made the other nine numbers all equal to 1, forgetting that they have to be different from each other.
• EI ignored the other nine numbers entirely, as if the biggest could take the whole total.