Worksheet generator

1.B — 3 centsKA-0010Money and change

• AI found the smallest amount that cannot be made rather than the largest one.
• CI did not notice that 7 is 2 plus 5, so I marked it as impossible without testing it.
• DI only tried using coins of one kind at a time and never mixed the two denominations.
• EI assumed odd amounts are impossible because one of the coins is even.

2.D — ThursdayKA-0021Remainders and modular cycles

• AI found the remainder 2 but counted the two days starting from today rather than starting from tomorrow.
• BI divided 100 by 7 and used the quotient of 14, treating the leftover days as if there were none.
• CI remembered there was a remainder but used a remainder of 1 instead of working it out.
• EI counted 100 divided by 7 as 14 remainder 3 instead of remainder 2.

3.C — 110KA-0029Unit conversion

• AI subtracted correctly in metres but then gave the answer in metres when centimetres were asked for.
• BI converted 3.5 metres to 35 centimetres instead of 350.
• DI subtracted without converting at all, taking 3.5 away from 240.
• EI added the two lengths instead of finding the difference between them.

4.C — 9:36KA-0041Factors, multiples, LCM and GCD by listing

• AI found the greatest common divisor of 12 and 18 instead of the least common multiple.
• BI added the two intervals together rather than looking for a time that is a multiple of both.
• DI found a common multiple but not the least one, landing on a later coincidence.
• EI multiplied the two intervals together instead of finding their least common multiple.

5.C — 70KA-0055Place value and digit positions

• AI gave the last digit of the number instead of looking at the 7 at all.
• BI gave the digit itself rather than what it is worth in the position it sits in.
• DI counted the positions from the left, so I read the 7 as being in the hundreds place.
• EI gave the value of the largest digit instead of the value of the 7.

6.B — 24KA-0083Perimeter and area of rectilinear shapes

• AI subtracted 6 from 20 and gave that, which is neither a side nor an area.
• CI took the other side to be 20 minus 6 divided by 2, forgetting there are two sides of each length.
• DI multiplied the perimeter by half the known side instead of finding the missing side first.
• EI used 16 as the other side, taking 20 minus 6 plus 2 rather than working from the perimeter properly.

7.C — 4KA-0120Draw the diagram

• AI assumed the walk was a loop because the north and south distances match.
• BI gave one of the distances walked rather than the distance from the start.
• DI added the two different directions together instead of drawing where the cat ends up.
• EI added up the whole distance walked, which is not the same as the distance from the start.

8.E — Not all birds can flyKA-0146Reading a logical statement precisely

• AI read some cannot as meaning none can, which is a far stronger claim.
• BI chose a statement that directly contradicts the one I was given.
• CI read some as meaning a majority, when it only guarantees at least one.
• DI read some as meaning exactly one, when it means at least one.

9.C — 4KA-0161Remainders and modular cycles

• AI assumed the cycle ends on 1 at every exponent that is a multiple of 2.
• BI used a remainder of 1 rather than 2 when dividing 50 by 3.
• DI doubled my way to 2 cubed = 8 and used 8 minus 2.
• EI assumed a large power of 2 must eventually be divisible by 7.

10.B — 2KA-0011Divisibility rules: 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10

• AI added the known digits to get 13 and then checked whether the missing digit itself was a multiple of 3.
• CI chose 3 because the question mentioned dividing by 3, without testing the digit sum at all.
• DI tested the last two digits, which is the rule for 4, not the rule for 3.
• EI added the digits but left out the 4 at the end, so my sum was four too small.

11.C — 16KA-0019Multi-step arithmetic word problems

• AI found what one child has left and gave that instead of the total for all four.
• BI divided 24 by 4 and then subtracted 2 twice, mixing up per-child steps with total steps.
• DI subtracted 2 pencils once from the whole pack instead of once from each of the four children.
• EI subtracted the 2 before sharing, so only one lot of 2 ever came out of the total.

12.C — 61KA-0030Arithmetic sequences and the nth term

• AI added the step 18 times, counting the gaps between terms one too few.
• BI multiplied the step of 3 by 20 and forgot that the first term is already in place.
• DI used a first term of 3 instead of 4 while adding 20 steps.
• EI added the step 20 times to the first term instead of 19 times.

13.C — 9 timesKA-0042Scaling and similar figures

• AI applied the length scale factor straight to the area.
• BI doubled the scale factor because area involves two dimensions, instead of squaring it.
• DI multiplied the scale factor by four, as though area scaled with the number of sides.
• EI cubed the scale factor, which is the rule for volume rather than area.

14.C — 11KA-0066Means, and working backwards from a mean

• AI assumed the missing number must be the mean itself.
• BI averaged the three known numbers instead of working from the total.
• DI repeated one of the numbers already given rather than computing the missing one.
• EI used a total of 37 instead of 36, adding the mean in once too often.

15.B — Bo onlyKA-0096Truth-tellers and liars

• AI took Ana's statement at face value without checking whether a truthful person could say it.
• CI decided nobody was lying without testing Ana's statement against that assumption.
• DI believed Ana's statement even after concluding she was a liar, which is what a liar's statement cannot be.
• EI gave up when Ana's statement looked circular, instead of testing one assumption all the way through.

16.A — Yes, alwaysKA-0102Informal proof by contradiction

• BI found one pair that works and assumed the argument depended on that particular card.
• CI tried a couple of selections, did not find a pair, and stopped looking.
• DI looked for a pattern in the numbers rather than at how many pairs there are to avoid.
• EI thought the answer depended on which six were taken, when the counting settles it for every choice.

17.C — 65KA-0103Recursive rules

• AI stopped at the fourth term, counting the starting number as the first step rather than the first term.
• BI generated one term too few, giving the fifth term instead of the sixth.
• DI doubled six times and subtracted 1 only once at the end.
• EI generated one term too many, giving the seventh instead of the sixth.

18.C — 25KA-0109Arithmetic sequences and the nth term

• AI added the step of 3 six times instead of seven, stopping at the seventh step.
• BI multiplied 3 by 8 without adding the first step's blocks.
• DI multiplied the step of 3 by 8 and added 4, taking one step too many.
• EI multiplied the first step's 4 blocks by the step number instead of following the pattern.

19.B — 4KA-0111Age problems

• AI aged only the child and left the mother's age unchanged.
• CI looked for when the mother is four times as old rather than three times.
• DI used the age difference of 24 and halved it, without checking the ratio it gives.
• EI gave the difference between their ages, which never changes, instead of a number of years.

20.C — 28KA-0123Eliminate impossible choices by bounding

• AI ruled out the square 6 by 6, forgetting that a square is a rectangle.
• BI did not think to try 4 by 9, so I judged this perimeter impossible.
• DI missed the 3 by 12 rectangle when listing the factor pairs.
• EI stopped listing factor pairs before reaching 2 by 18.

21.A — 56KA-0163Selections of a few objects

• BI counted ordered selections, so I counted the same three people once for every order they could stand in.
• CI multiplied the 8 members by the 3 places, which counts something quite different from a selection.
• DI divided the 336 ordered selections by 3 instead of by 3 factorial.
• EI chose 2 people rather than 3.

22.A — 60KA-0172Selections of a few objects

• BI chose any 4 from all 9 people and ignored the two-and-two requirement.
• CI added the two counts instead of multiplying them.
• DI treated the choices as ordered, counting the same committee several times.
• EI used 5 x 4 x 2 or a similar shortcut rather than counting each selection properly.

23.A — 48 km/hKA-0174Rate, time, distance

• BI averaged the two speeds, which would only be right if equal TIME were spent at each, not equal distance.
• CI weighted the two speeds by their own values instead of by the time each leg took.
• DI halved the correct answer, dividing by the total distance twice.
• EI added the two speeds together, which gives a number faster than either leg and so cannot be an average of them.

24.C — 8KA-0012Casework

• AI counted each pair of digits once instead of counting both orders, such as 17 and 71.
• BI listed the pairs starting from 1 and 7 and forgot the number 80, where the second digit is zero.
• DI included 08 as a two-digit number, but a two-digit number cannot start with zero.
• EI counted both orders of every pair and then counted the pairs that reverse to themselves twice as well.

25.E — 9KA-0037Last-digit behavior of products and powers

• AI assumed a number this large has no reachable last digit and gave up on the cycle.
• BI found the cycle 7, 9, 3, 1 but used a remainder of 0 when the remainder is actually 2.
• CI found the cycle but counted its positions starting at zero, shifting my answer along by one.
• DI assumed the units digit of any power of 7 is always 7.

26.B — 6KA-0045Back-solve from the answer choices

• AI tested the smallest choice first and stopped at the first one that felt about right.
• CI read a third of itself as three times itself and solved the wrong equation.
• DI reversed the comparison, finding a number whose third is 4 less than itself in the wrong direction.
• EI picked the largest choice because dividing by three made me expect a big starting number.

27.D — 8KA-0134Paper folding and hole punching

• AI forgot that the punch goes through every layer, not just the top one.
• BI undid only one of the two folds before counting.
• CI doubled twice for the folds but added the second hole instead of doubling for it too.
• EI counted three folds instead of two, doubling one time too many.

28.D — DeeKA-0136Ordering and ranking from clues

• AI ignored the very first clue, which rules Ana out of the front directly.
• BI put Bo at the front, but Bo must have Ana immediately in front of him.
• CI forgot that Cal is fixed at the back of the line.
• EI stopped once two arrangements seemed possible, without testing whether the second one actually fits every clue.

29.C — 750KA-0137Multi-step arithmetic word problems

• AI poured out half instead of a third and then forgot to add the 150 ml back.
• BI poured out the third correctly but never added the 150 ml.
• DI assumed the 150 ml added back was the same as the amount poured out, so nothing changed.
• EI added the 150 ml to the full jug without pouring anything out first.

30.B — 7KA-0157The pigeonhole principle

• AI thought that one more than the number of colours must give three of a kind, which only guarantees a PAIR.
• CI got to two of each colour, then added one more for each colour instead of one more in total.
• DI assumed the worst case meant emptying the largest pile of 12 reds first.
• EI answered with the number of socks I want rather than the number I must take to be sure of them.