Worksheet generator

1.C — 70KA-0055Place value and digit positions

• AI gave the last digit of the number instead of looking at the 7 at all.
• BI gave the digit itself rather than what it is worth in the position it sits in.
• DI counted the positions from the left, so I read the 7 as being in the hundreds place.
• EI gave the value of the largest digit instead of the value of the 7.

2.C — 9KA-0072Systematic listing

• AI counted only the numbers with two identical digits, like 11, 22 and 33.
• BI required the two digits to be different, even though repeats are allowed.
• DI allowed a fourth digit that was not in the list.
• EI counted three-digit numbers instead of two-digit ones.

3.B — 75KA-0088Angles on lines, in triangles, in polygons

• AI added the three angles wrongly, getting 295 instead of 285.
• CI used an angle sum of 370, mis-remembering the total for a quadrilateral.
• DI repeated one of the given angles instead of computing the missing one.
• EI used the triangle's 180 degrees and then adjusted, rather than the quadrilateral's 360.

4.B — Write an answer for every one of themKA-0127Never leave a blank — there is no penalty

• AI treated guessing as dishonest, but the rules of the paper explicitly allow it and cost nothing.
• CI answered one and left two blanks that could each have scored, at no risk.
• DI tried to communicate with the marker, but only the answers are scored.
• EI offered working on a paper where only the chosen letter is marked.

5.E — Not all birds can flyKA-0146Reading a logical statement precisely

• AI read some cannot as meaning none can, which is a far stronger claim.
• BI chose a statement that directly contradicts the one I was given.
• CI read some as meaning a majority, when it only guarantees at least one.
• DI read some as meaning exactly one, when it means at least one.

6.A — 123KA-0160Arithmetic sequences and the nth term

• BI multiplied the step by 30 instead of by 29, forgetting that the first term needs no steps.
• CI used 4 times 30 and forgot to add the starting value.
• DI added 28 steps instead of 29, counting the gaps one short.
• EI treated the first term as the step and used 7 times 30 minus something close.

7.B — 10KA-0087Scaling and similar figures

• AI added the difference between the areas' square roots to the side rather than multiplying by their ratio.
• CI doubled the side because the larger area is roughly double the smaller.
• DI used the ratio of the areas as if it were the ratio of the lengths, then adjusted.
• EI multiplied the side by the ratio of the areas divided by three, mixing up which ratio applies to lengths.

8.B — 21KA-0104Recursive rules

• AI counted the two starting terms as one, so I stopped at the seventh term.
• CI added the two before it but slipped once in the middle of the chain.
• DI generated one term too many and gave the ninth.
• EI doubled each term instead of adding the two before it.

9.A — Yes, and many orders workKA-0049Parity of numbers (odd/even behavior)

• BI found one arrangement that works and assumed a problem this fiddly could only have one answer.
• CI saw five odd numbers against four even ones and called that a mismatch, when a row of nine needs exactly five of one and four of the other.
• DI blamed the length of the row rather than checking how many odd and even numbers it has to hold.
• EI decided the first number settles it without checking that starting even would need five even numbers, and only four exist.

10.B — 7KA-0157The pigeonhole principle

• AI thought that one more than the number of colours must give three of a kind, which only guarantees a PAIR.
• CI got to two of each colour, then added one more for each colour instead of one more in total.
• DI assumed the worst case meant emptying the largest pile of 12 reds first.
• EI answered with the number of socks I want rather than the number I must take to be sure of them.