Tap a speaker to listen. Then try saying it yourself! Tap it again to stop.
Loading…
Worksheet generator
Pick what you want, print the page. The answer key comes with it, on its own sheet, and it tells you the mistake behind every wrong choice — not just which letter is right.
This exact URL always produces this exact sheet — bookmark it and the answer key will still match next term. Print with your browser; the controls and the site navigation are left off the page.
1.Toma spent 4 euros, then spent half of what was left, and now has 6 euros. How much did she start with?[3]
A10
B14
C16
D20
E24
2.Ana says: "Bo and I are both liars." Each child is either always truthful or always a liar. Who is telling the truth?[4]
AAna only
BBo only
Cboth of them
Dneither of them
Eit cannot be decided
3.All the red boxes are heavy. Box X is not heavy. What must be true?[4]
ABox X is red
BBox X is not red
CBox X is blue
DSome red boxes are light
ENothing can be said about box X
4.A number is doubled, then 6 is added, then the result is halved. The answer is 11. What was the original number?[4]
A4
B8
C11
D16
E22
5.Cards numbered 1 to 10 lie face up. You take any six of them. Must two of your cards add up to 11?[4]
AYes, always
BYes, but only if you take the card numbered 1
CNo, six cards can be chosen that avoid it
DOnly if the six numbers are consecutive
EIt cannot be decided without knowing the cards
6.Ana says "Bo is lying." Bo says "Cal is lying." Cal says "Ana and Bo are both lying." How many of the three are telling the truth?[5]
A0
B1
C2
D3
Eit cannot be decided
7.Seven cups all stand upside down. In one move you must turn over exactly two cups. Can all seven ever stand the right way up?[5]
AYes, in 4 moves
BYes, in 7 moves
CYes, but it takes many moves
DIt depends which two cups you pick
ENo, it is impossible
8.One of nine identical-looking coins is slightly heavier. Using only a balance, what is the smallest number of weighings that is certain to find it?[5]
A1
B2
C3
D4
E8
9.The numbers 1 to 10 stand in a row. A move swaps two neighbours. After exactly 45 moves, can the row be back in its starting order?[5]
AYes, always
BYes, if the swaps are chosen well
CNo, because 45 is not a multiple of 10
DNo, because the number of moves is odd
EIt depends which numbers are swapped
10.Can a 10 by 10 board be covered exactly by T-shaped tiles of four squares each, with no gaps and no overlaps?[5]
AYes, and it is straightforward
BYes, but the arrangement is fiddly
CNo, because 100 is not a multiple of 4
DNo, because the two colours cannot balance
EIt depends how the tiles are turned
Math Kangaroo Star · https://kangaroo-atlas.vercel.app · seed 8 · CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 · Independent project, not affiliated with Math Kangaroo in USA, NFP.
Answer key — Math Kangaroo practice
Each wrong choice carries the thinking that produces it. When a student picks C, this is what they were doing.
1.C — 16KA-0050Working backwards
AI added the 4 and the 6 and stopped, forgetting to undo the halving.
BI doubled the 6 first and then added the 4, reversing the steps in the wrong order.
DI doubled the total at the end rather than doubling only the amount left after the first spend.
EI doubled twice because spending half felt like it needed undoing more than once.
2.B — Bo onlyKA-0096Truth-tellers and liars
AI took Ana's statement at face value without checking whether a truthful person could say it.
CI decided nobody was lying without testing Ana's statement against that assumption.
DI believed Ana's statement even after concluding she was a liar, which is what a liar's statement cannot be.
EI gave up when Ana's statement looked circular, instead of testing one assumption all the way through.
3.B — Box X is not redKA-0099Reading a logical statement precisely
AI read the rule backwards, as if being heavy were what makes a box red.
CI assumed not red must mean one particular other colour, when the rule says nothing about which.
DI contradicted the rule I was given rather than applying it to box X.
EI decided one fact could not settle anything, without testing what would follow if X were red.
4.B — 8KA-0100Working backwards
AI undid the operations in the order they were written instead of in reverse order.
CI gave the final answer back, assuming the three steps cancelled each other out.
DI doubled the 11 and subtracted the 6 but forgot the final halving that undoes the doubling.
EI undid only the halving and stopped there without touching the other two steps.
5.A — Yes, alwaysKA-0102Informal proof by contradiction
BI found one pair that works and assumed the argument depended on that particular card.
CI tried a couple of selections, did not find a pair, and stopped looking.
DI looked for a pattern in the numbers rather than at how many pairs there are to avoid.
EI thought the answer depended on which six were taken, when the counting settles it for every choice.
6.B — 1KA-0017Truth-tellers and liars
AI assumed everyone could be lying at once without checking that Cal's statement would then be true.
CI found one consistent truth-teller and added another without testing whether both could hold together.
DI assumed everyone was telling the truth without noticing that Ana's statement then contradicts Bo's.
EI gave up after one assumption led to a contradiction, instead of trying the other assumption.
7.E — No, it is impossibleKA-0028Parity arguments
AI found a sequence that turned over most of the cups and assumed the last one could be fixed somehow.
BI matched the number of moves to the number of cups without checking whether the target is reachable at all.
CI assumed that with enough moves any arrangement can be reached.
DI thought the choice of which cups to flip could change whether the target is reachable.
8.B — 2KA-0094Weighing and balance puzzles
AI assumed one weighing could separate nine possibilities, but it has only three outcomes.
CI split the coins into halves each time, which wastes the balance's third outcome.
DI weighed the coins one against another in pairs rather than in groups.
EI compared each coin with a known good one in turn, which always works but is nowhere near the fewest.
9.D — No, because the number of moves is oddKA-0097Parity arguments
AI assumed enough moves can undo anything, without asking what each move preserves.
BI tried a few sequences that nearly worked and assumed a better choice would finish the job.
CI reached for the number of items rather than for what a single swap actually changes.
EI thought the choice of swaps could change the outcome, when every swap has the same effect.
10.D — No, because the two colours cannot balanceKA-0101Coloring arguments
AI checked that 100 divides by 4 and treated that as proof that a covering exists.
BI assumed a covering must exist somewhere and that I simply had not found it yet.
CI gave a reason that is not even true, since 100 really is a multiple of 4.
EI thought orientation could rescue it, but every turn of a T covers the same mixture of colours.