Worksheet generator

1.C — 9KA-0072Systematic listing

• AI counted only the numbers with two identical digits, like 11, 22 and 33.
• BI required the two digits to be different, even though repeats are allowed.
• DI allowed a fourth digit that was not in the list.
• EI counted three-digit numbers instead of two-digit ones.

2.D — 9KA-0046Counting by position (sliding window)

• AI cut the board into four separate 2 by 2 blocks instead of sliding the square one step at a time.
• BI counted the three sliding positions along the top and doubled them for two rows.
• CI counted the positions along the top row and down the left column and added them.
• EI counted the sixteen small squares on the board rather than the 2 by 2 squares.

3.B — 3KA-0068Tree diagrams

• AI read the two in exactly two heads as the answer rather than as a condition to count.
• CI counted the outcomes with two or more heads, so I included the three-head one as well.
• DI counted the orderings of three different objects instead of listing the eight outcomes.
• EI gave the total number of possible outcomes rather than the number with exactly two heads.

4.D — 24KA-0073Arrangements of a few objects

• AI counted the letters rather than their arrangements.
• BI multiplied 4 by 3 and stopped, forgetting the last two positions.
• CI used 4 choices for every position, as if letters could repeat.
• EI used 4 choices in each of four positions, which allows every letter to repeat.

5.B — 15KA-0074Selections of a few objects

• AI doubled the group size instead of counting pairs.
• CI allowed a student to be paired with themselves, adding six impossible pairs.
• DI counted each pair twice, once in each order, and forgot to halve.
• EI multiplied 6 by 6, counting every ordered pair including a student with themselves.

6.A — 56KA-0163Selections of a few objects

• BI counted ordered selections, so I counted the same three people once for every order they could stand in.
• CI multiplied the 8 members by the 3 places, which counts something quite different from a selection.
• DI divided the 336 ordered selections by 3 instead of by 3 factorial.
• EI chose 2 people rather than 3.

7.C — 48KA-0070Counting with restrictions

• AI treated the twins as one child and forgot they can also swap places with each other.
• BI glued the twins together into a single block but then forgot that the block can be arranged with the others in more ways than I counted.
• DI halved the 120 total, assuming the twins are together in exactly half the arrangements.
• EI counted every arrangement of five children and forgot the twins' condition entirely.

8.A — 12KA-0071Overcount, then correct

• BI divided the 120 arrangements by 6 rather than by the 10 movements that leave a bracelet looking the same.
• CI allowed for turning the bracelet but forgot it can also be flipped over.
• DI halved the 120 for flipping but forgot that turning also gives the same bracelet.
• EI counted every arrangement in a line, as if the bracelet had a fixed first bead.

9.B — 7KA-0157The pigeonhole principle

• AI thought that one more than the number of colours must give three of a kind, which only guarantees a PAIR.
• CI got to two of each colour, then added one more for each colour instead of one more in total.
• DI assumed the worst case meant emptying the largest pile of 12 reds first.
• EI answered with the number of socks I want rather than the number I must take to be sure of them.

10.A — 120KA-0166Counting up to symmetry

• BI counted every arrangement in a row, so each circular seating got counted once for every rotation.
• CI divided 720 by 20 or some other number instead of by the 6 rotations.
• DI divided by 12, treating reflections as identical too, though the question only allows rotations.
• EI fixed two people rather than one, dividing by an extra factor.