Worksheet generator

1.C — 14KA-0051Complementary counting

• AI counted the multiples of 3 and gave that instead of the numbers that are not multiples.
• BI counted 21 as a multiple of 3 inside the range, so I removed one too many.
• DI removed only the multiples of 3 that are also even, so I subtracted three instead of six.
• EI gave the size of the whole range and forgot to remove anything at all.

2.C — 6KA-0054Counting shapes hidden inside a figure

• AI counted only the three small rectangles drawn as separate cells and stopped there.
• BI counted the three small rectangles and the whole one, and forgot the two made of two cells.
• DI counted a rectangle made of the left and right cells, even though they are not next to each other.
• EI assumed any pair of the four vertical lines makes a rectangle without checking each one.

3.C — 9KA-0072Systematic listing

• AI counted only the numbers with two identical digits, like 11, 22 and 33.
• BI required the two digits to be different, even though repeats are allowed.
• DI allowed a fourth digit that was not in the list.
• EI counted three-digit numbers instead of two-digit ones.

4.D — 6KA-0003Counting shapes hidden inside a figure

• AI counted only the three small triangles I could see as separate cells and stopped there.
• BI counted the three small triangles and added the whole big one, but forgot the two made of two cells.
• CI found the three small ones and one pair, but missed the second pair of neighbouring triangles.
• EI assumed every choice of two of the four lines would make a triangle, without checking each one.

5.B — 3KA-0068Tree diagrams

• AI read the two in exactly two heads as the answer rather than as a condition to count.
• CI counted the outcomes with two or more heads, so I included the three-head one as well.
• DI counted the orderings of three different objects instead of listing the eight outcomes.
• EI gave the total number of possible outcomes rather than the number with exactly two heads.

6.A — 6KA-0173Counting up to symmetry

• BI counted every colouring of the four edges and forgot that rotations make some of them identical.
• CI divided 16 by 4, but that only works when no painting is left unchanged by a rotation, and some are.
• DI halved 16, treating only the 180 degree turn as a symmetry.
• EI listed by how many edges are black but forgot that two black edges can be adjacent or opposite.

7.C — 6KA-0025Counting up to symmetry

• AI also treated bracelets that are mirror images as the same, but only rotations were allowed.
• BI divided the number of beads by itself rather than dividing the number of arrangements by the number of rotations.
• DI divided the 24 arrangements by 2 instead of by the 4 rotations of a circle of four beads.
• EI counted every arrangement in a line and forgot that rotating a bracelet gives the same bracelet.

8.C — 4KA-0040The pigeonhole principle

• AI answered with the lucky case, where the first two socks happen to match.
• BI used the number of colours as my answer without adding one for the sock that must repeat.
• DI worked from the number of socks of each colour instead of the number of colours.
• EI took the whole drawer, guaranteeing a pair but far more socks than are needed.

9.C — 4KA-0140The multiplication principle

• AI counted the codes that do start with A rather than the ones that do not.
• BI counted the letters available for the first position instead of counting whole codes.
• DI counted every arrangement of the three letters and forgot the restriction.
• EI allowed letters to repeat, which the words each exactly once rule out.

10.A — 91/216KA-0168Complementary counting

• BI added 1/6 three times, which counts the overlapping cases more than once and would exceed 1 for seven rolls.
• CI worked out the probability of NO six and forgot to subtract it from 1.
• DI found the probability of three sixes instead of at least one.
• EI gave the probability for a single roll and ignored that there are three.